Roman Linear Defence for Normal People

This is my understanding (based on a seriously incompetent and internally contradictory first-year lecture) of the defensive strategy employed by the Roman Empire until around the third century. It applies to Hadrian’s Wall and probably the more northerly, less successful Antonine Wall.

GREEN LINE: The frontier. Generally built along a natural barrier; if one wasn’t available, they built a wall, as here.
GREEN BOXES: Frontier forts. Garrisons of variable quality, usually auxilia. What we’d nowadays consider second-line troops. Do sentry duty on the walls and have fast communications to rear lines (despatch riders, runners, beacons, smoke signals.)
BLACK LINES: Roman roads. Straight.
RED BOXES: Forts with garrisons made up of professional legionaries. Very well trained, equipped and disciplined soldiers with good officers and generally lots of combat experience. Bad enough dudes.

The frontier has several purposes. It’s a massive prestige thing, the largest man-made object locals would have ever seen (…apart from Hadrian’s Wall), it’s an excellent boundary delineating “PAX ROMANA” from “HEATHEN OUTERLANDERS,” and it’s a reasonable defence line in itself; random raiding parties would definitely be deterred. Against more determined attacks, it works as a speed bump/tripwire. The troops at the wall fight a delaying action while signalling to the legionary forts. The matchless legions then converge on the incursion and, well, kill everyone.

Pretty much the entire active Roman military would be near a line like this in peacetime, with no strategic reserve; policy forbade having troops close to home, for fear of military coups. With this approach, 300,000 soldiers effectively defended an area the size of Europe, containing a population at times above fifty million, for several hundred years. The decline and fall of the Roman empire occurred for a number of reasons, and the shift in emphasis from frontier defence was one of them.

We now return to your regularly scheduled travelblogs.


3 thoughts on “Roman Linear Defence for Normal People

  1. Hitler couldn’t understand the simplicity and time-worn wisdom of dynamic response and so that is the reason this isn’t written in Kraut.

    Sad, but ultimately good that the Kaiser couldn’t do with tanks and bombers what the Caesars did with horses and pikes.

    Extra-funny is that the human immune system uses a version of this, as well.

    • brosencrantz says:

      This was strictly a frontier defence posture; it’s hard to make that shit work when your policy is attacking all of Europe rather than defending it. By the time the Germans were on the defensive it didn’t really matter what they did.

      They did use a similar defensive posture on the Atlantic Wall (as has almost everyone since Rome who managed the combination of committing to frontier defence and not being completely retarded) but Wehrmacht incompetence and squabbling and Allied air supremacy prevented them from rolling Overlord back into the sea.

      Also, Hitler was never a Kaiser.

      • Derp, yeah, should have known that. WWI/WWII. Yeah.

        I’m mainly talking about the reich after the fall of France. I’m still mainly of the opinion that if Hitler had trusted Rommel to know what the fuck he was talking about then they’d have been swimming back to Dover.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s